Skip Nav

Sample Essay on Healthy School Lunches in America

You May Also Like

❶In other words, it would seem almost absurd to expect schools to serve healthier or less processed lunches when they are expected to prepare a meal for about a dollar. This would require investments not only of money but also of imagination; and unless this can be done, it would be unreasonable to expect any meaningful improvements to be made regarding the real quality of school lunches within the nation.

Who can edit:

What is the cost of a nutritious school meal in The United States?
Writing 100
Downloading prezi...

Schools are thinking more about money than considering what is beneficial for their students. Schools worry more about costs than the potential diminishing health of their students. While students are making unhealthy choices regarding their lunch menus, schools would rather keep the lunch menus the same to ensure students continue to spend their money on the options schools pay for. Not only does this shows that schools only care about money, but it also shows that they are willing to put the health of their students in jeopardy in order to maintain these costs.

It is definitely not entirely schools fault for providing children with unhealthy lunch option. The federal government makes providing healthy school lunches extremely difficult for schools. Schools have to balance between affording meals for all of their students, paying staff to prepare meals for their students, and being able to meet all of the federal guidelines.

The lack of money schools are being provided with causes schools to make healthy lunches to take a backseat. Schools should transform from the typical packaged lunch foods to acquiring foods that are locally grown. In fact to test locally grown foods, the Center of Disease Control partnered with 14 schools, based on their percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-cost lunch, and provided them with locally grown fruits and vegetables for their school lunch programs Mikulak, R.

Schools were given an incredible opportunity to provide their students with fresher food options for their students. While schools should try to transfer over to all locally grown foods, it is not an easy process.

Local foods is a generally a better option for students, but it is very difficult for schools to obtain enough food at a great price for everyone. Schools have to fight for their students and make sacrifices for them in order to ensure a better, healthier life for them. Although schools have problems with purchasing locally grown foods, farmers have been working to increase the use of locally grown foods in school menus.

Some schools are lucky enough to have a central commissary, so farmers can bring their locally grown foods directly to the schools instead of having these foods shipped. Even when foods are being shipped to different schools, farmers are working during the summer months to prepare and freeze them for the school year Mikulak, R. With this new ability to purchase locally grown foods at the same time meet the necessary guidelines, gives people enough hope that students can finally haved a balanced meal in schools.

Although that these meet the guidelines, it is hard for any school to fully commit to this plan of action due to the costs of purchasing enough supply for everyone. At least there is now a safe and approved way for schools to purchase locally grown foods. As more student learn about their unhealthy school lunches and the benefits of locally grown foods, they want to make a change to better their school lunches.

Students are taking action to improve the foods that are being served in their school cafeterias. In , a group of students met with their state representative, public health, and school officials to present them with an idea to infuse locally grown foods in their school lunches. Students were granted the opportunity to set aside the typical greasy school options, to create their own naturally grown foods. I think this shows how much students actually care about their health.

Not all students agree with serving hamburgers and pizza everyday, students actually care that their schools are not putting enough effort into making sure they are having healthy options for their lunches.

Students recognizes that what the schools claim is healthy is not healthy at all. Schools have skewed ideas that students do not care about their school lunches.

These students were able to make their goal into a monthly deal. Students were found a way to make a goal into a reality. Although their meal plan is only once a month, it is a great start to one day imposing healthy options in schools. In my high school, healthy food options were enforced. They required everyone to not only be active in two sports, but to also eat healthy at school.

Our lunch menu always included a balanced meal with a soup, salad, and fruit bar for alternative options. I believe that learning a balance diet in high school provided me the knowledge to know the choices I can directly affect my health. Students are obtaining most of their calories from school meals, and I think it is essential for those calories to derive from healthier options.

I think everything I learned from my high school taught me to be more aware and to care about what I eat. I truly believe that everything that are enforced in schools make students who they are. I think my positive experiences mean that it is possible for students to enjoy healthy eating options.

Although not everyone in my school liked a lot of the healthy options, a majority of the student body appreciated that our school cared to provide us with nutritious options. I hope that students and even schools take a stand against unhealthy foods and start to cater to healthier foods.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Food Critics Flunk School Lunches. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. To start with, then, it is worth noting that Michelle Obama has recently taken efforts to reform and improve the quality of school lunches, as part of her more general campaign to address the public health issue of childhood obesity.

One of the main provisions of this program had consisted of considerably stricter nutritional requirements for the food that is served to students within schools.

Championed by First Lady Michelle Obama, the HHFKA set new nutrition standards for school meals while expanding access to taxpayer-funded breakfast and lunch to millions of students. While the law was initially hailed as a noble effort to address the American paradox of childhood hunger and obesity, the HHFKA may have created more problems than it solved paragraph 3. It would seem, however, that this initiative, well-intentioned as it obviously is, has met with considerable failure.

Some of these specific issues will be addressed in greater depth below. For the time being, though, it is perhaps worth simply pointing out that there is considerable potential for a disjunction to arise between what is a technically nutritious meal on the one hand, and what it is actually desirable as real food for children on the other.

In the battle for nutrition education and preventing obesity , a child's taste profile is a key opponent. It would seem that in general, Michelle Obama's initiative has led to schools attempting to follow the letter of the law with respect to the regulations, sometimes or even often at the expense of the subjective quality of the food in terms of balance and taste.

This is somewhat ironic, to say the least, and it calls into question the very concept of the "healthy" itself, insofar as the concept does not seem to adequately take into account the way that children subjectively experience their food.

In any event, it will now be worth turning to two specific issues regarding the plight of healthier school lunch programs in America. The first of these has to do with cost, both in terms of the money available to produce school meals and the money it costs to purchase those meals.

And the second has to do with students simply not eating the lunches that are being served to them. Each of these issues is a crucial part of why it has proven to be so difficult for so long to achieve sustainable and meaningful improvements in the quality of the meals served through school lunch programs across this nation. Regarding the issue of cost, it is surely worth considering the government's funding of school lunch programs.

But districts generally require their food departments to pay their own overhead, including electricity, accounting and trash collection.

Most are left with a dollar and change for food—and. In other words, it would seem almost absurd to expect schools to serve healthier or less processed lunches when they are expected to prepare a meal for about a dollar.

This would seem to be logistically unfeasible, to put the matter mildly; and it would seem surprising not that school lunches are not healthier but that lunch programs are even able to produce edible food at all with that kind of budget. Moreover, this problem of cost is exacerbated when schools begin outsourcing their lunch programs to food management companies.

But they know how to manage the subsidies" Schreiber. These companies, of course, have little incentive to improve the quality of school lunches, insofar as such improvements would get in the way of their profit motive; and as for the schools themselves, most are likely just grateful to have solved the problem of producing meals on such a budget in a relatively painless way.

The situation thus becomes one in which the government itself is the only primary stakeholder pushing for healthier school lunches but also refuses to invest the kind of money that would be required in order to actually make this happen. The economics of the matter thus tend to take precedence, and school lunches tend to remain how they are. There is a second critical issue facing the push for healthier school lunches—an issue that is so obvious that one may almost be forgiven for having forgotten about it.

One of the leading causes of obesity in children is not having access to healthy food. Here, they are provided a healthy balanced meal and declining to eat it. Getting fresh fruits and vegetables onto lunch trays in public schools was only half the battle, because it turns out most kids still aren't eating them.

Researchers from John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health studied students' eating habits and found nearly six out of 10 won't even touch a healthy food option on their plate Olson. And of course, there would be no point at all in making such healthy options available in the first place, if there is no effective way to persuade students to actually eat the stuff and much of it will end up going in the garbage.

In short, there would seem to exist a serious disjunction between the concept of the healthy on the one hand and the concept of the desirable on the other—a disjunction that policymakers have apparently failed to take with adequate seriousness. Exactly 13 minutes later she was done. The chicken nuggets and the starch were gone. But the green beans? Still there in a neat pile and headed straight for the trash".

Among other things, that is a whole lot of wasted time, money, and effort. It would seem that from the perspective of many children, the healthy option in school lunches barely even registers as edible food at all, given how they treat it: This is a very serious issue, and unless it is addressed in a meaningful way, any further discussion about the value of healthier school lunches would clearly be rendered irrelevant. The problem, at least to some extent, would seem to be that school lunches are typically so poorly integrated in the first place.

After all, in most normal meals, it is not possible to discretely separate out the healthy component from the unhealthy component; rather, the meal is generally called healthy exactly because it has a good integration of the different components within an actual single unit, as it were. This is a tactic that is commonly used by fast food companies used to mask the health risks typically associated with easting fast food.

Healthy school lunches in America: The First Lady's perspective

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

School / College; School lunches; School lunches. June 2, But if students do decide to eat school lunches they need to be aware of what they are eating. This is a really good essay.

Privacy FAQs

Persuasive essay Yum, yum; another school lunch While some of our foods are “out of this world”, we sometimes find nasty “here on earth” human hairs in our foods!

About Our Ads

Oct 12,  · Check out our top Free Essays on Persuasive Essay School Lunch to help you write your own Essay. Argumentative Essay (school lunch) Narrative Essay (Ecuador) Viking way Joshua Hooten Austin, TX November 27, Bradford Area School District mine very much does. This is my third year attending this school, and my opinion on the matter of school lunches has only increased with intensity. I understand that you want to save .

Cookie Info

Students in Lisa Erickson’s St. Francis Middle School language arts class were assigned a final writing project of composing a five paragraph persuasive essay. Following are of three student essays. Did you know that in Minnesota middle school lunches contain calories per day? The. School Lunches Essay Argumentative Free Essay Template. Free Essay Examples, Essay Formats, Writing Tools and Writing Tips.