Each of us has the right to live and we have no right to deprive people of this. According to the Bible, the authority to punish, which presumably includes the death penalty, comes from God. Moreover, the death of a murderer cannot bring peace to the victim, the death of a murderer cannot reverse the crime, and the death of a single murderer will never ensure that the act of murder never takes place again. Justice is never advanced in the taking of a human life.
Morality is never upheld by a legalized murder. The second reason is the execution of innocent people. According to the statistics, twenty-three people who we now know to be innocent have been murdered by the state since Three hundred and fifty people have been found not guilty while in death row awaiting execution. One of the most famous cases of the murder of an innocent man was execution of Timothy Evans in He was tried and executed for the murder of his baby daughter Geraldine.
Thus, taking the life of innocent people, we become murderers. On the other hand, the death penalty is the only just punishment for many of the relatives and friends of the victims. It is difficult to live, when you know that the man who killed your loved one is still breathing. Furthermore, the most common and reasonable argument is that the death penalty is an effective deterrent.
The fear of death affects everybody, and criminals are no exception. If they understand that after the serious crime they must bear such punishment, they should think twice before they commit to it. This argument is supported by statistics which reveal that the crime rate in countries where in this form of punishment still exists is far less as compared to those countries wherein it has been abolished. In conclusion, there are many of pros and cons of the death penalty, but there is no single solution.
Because the issues concerning life and death are always the most difficult. In my opinion, the death penalty is absolutely contrary to moral principles and it is not able to bring us closer to justice. And the question arises: The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid.
Another argument put forth by death penalty abolitionists is the possibility of executing an innocent person. Many people that argue this overestimate how often this happens, it is an extremely rare occurrence and has not happened since the death penalty was reintroduced in Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof. We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes.
Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. Stewart points out that death penalty cases are held to a much higher standard. Due process in these cases takes much longer so that the court can be absolutely sure that the person is guilty before sentencing him to execution.
This helps to eliminate any errors that could lead to executing the wrong person. He also points out that although there is a small possibility for mistakes to be made, this does not mean capital punishment should be abolished. If everything that had the potential for harmful mistakes were outlawed, society would be extremely crippled.
It is true that there is disproportionality when it comes to the races and classes that most frequently receive the death penalty.
It has been proven that minorities and those with lower income levels are overrepresented on death row. This is not due to discrimination; this is due to the higher rate at which these groups commit crime ProCon. It has been argued that poverty breeds criminality; if this is true then it makes sense that those at a lower income level would more frequently be sentenced to execution than those at higher income levels ProCon.
It has also been proven that minorities are disproportionately poor, and therefore they would also be more likely to receive the death penalty. Ernest van den Haag said it best:. The only relevant question is: Whether or not others deserved the same punishment, whatever the economic or racial group, have avoided execution is irrelevant. It does not matter what race or economic status a person is, if he is guilty he must receive the appropriate punishment, which in some cases may be the death penalty.
Capital punishment can be a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it. The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral. The arguments against the death penalty often do not hold up when examined more closely. It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not.
The death penalty can be an extremely useful tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society. It is imperative that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly. The Case for Justice.
Death Penalty Curricula for High School. Death Penalty Information Center. This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 24th, at 5: You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2. You can leave a comment , or trackback from your own site. You must be logged in to post a comment. Ernest van den Haag, a professor at Fordham University, wrote about the issue of deterrence: Ernest van den Haag said it best: Works Cited Bosner, Kevin.
July 10, at 9: March 23, at March 1, at 9: January 5, at 6: December 1, at 1: December 1, at October 18, at Score Hero Hack Download. August 19, at 9: July 20, at 3: July 7, at July 1, at June 30, at 8: June 30, at 7: June 26, at 8: June 14, at 8: June 10, at 8: League Of Legends Hack Ip. June 9, at 8: June 2, at 9: May 17, at May 14, at May 7, at 7: April 28, at 3: April 20, at 6:
It is both cruel and costly. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end.
Against Capital Punishment Essay - Against Capital Punishment Currently in the United States, the death penalty is ruled constitutional. This is a mistake, and capital punishment should be unconstitutional.
Essay Against Capital Punishment. Essay Against Capital Punishment In this country, The Death Penalty is used to punish some of the worst criminals. The country decides to take their lives for the crimes . capital crime. However it is not so easy to consider death penalty as an easy way to punish the guilty. If the death penalty is to condemn it does not mean that the guilty party should be released or allowed some sympathy. It would defeat the purpose, as it would be using violence to counter violence.
The capital punishment sends a message to the people that the justice system is just there to help the families of the victims of the heinous crimes and not for the accused people who could also be innocent (Kronenwetter 36). Proponents of capital punishment also often claim that it deters potential murderers from crime in general and homicide in particular. In some public opinion polls, deterrence appears as the most often cited reason for supporting capital punishment.